Wireless on a Plane: is it really such a good idea after all?

[Harv]

Several airlines are moving toward offering wireless Internet service to passengers. We wrote a while back about American Airlines' plans to test wi-fi service this year via a company called Aircell that uses cellular-based technology. Continental Airlines has announced similar plans, starting next year. Southwest Airlines is one of the most recent to commit to testing in- flight broadband services, starting this summer. In this case, they'll be using a satellite-to-aircraft service provided by a company called Row 44.

One problem with these services is that connection speeds may be a lot lower than you're used to if you have broadband Internet services at home. According to Row 44's president, Greg Fialcowitz, each customer in a plane will get "at least 100 Kbps of bandwidth." That's going to seem pretty slow to folks who are used to anywhere from 1 Mbps DSL to 3-6 Mbps cable to 15 Mbps FiOS connections.

Even so, the prospect of having any type of Internet connection at all on the plane is welcome news for many travelers, especially business travelers who hate the wasted "downtime" of sitting on a plane for hours without the ability to check their email, do web research or work on projects that require access to their company networks. With in-flight connectivity, you can do all of that and more.

It's been tried before - the Connexion service that started with such high hopes was a dismal failure, in part because of the cost (including added fuel costs) of the equipment to the airlines and in part because of the exorbitant prices charged the customer. No matter how advanced your online addiction is, most folks will think twice before shelling out $30 for a few hours of Internet access.

The new services promise to be a lot more cost-effective for the airlines and have more user-friendly pricing plans (although still more than we're used to paying for wi-fi access at hotels and airports, where most providers charge around $10 for a full 24 hours of access). Still, $8 for the duration of the flight is much more palatable than $30.

One thing that hasn't come up much in the discussion, though, is the issue of security. For users, security is always a concern when connected to any public hotspot. Wireless networks are inherently less secure than wired networks. Wi- fi providers don't always take the strongest precautions in setting up the networks. Adding wireless access to planes opens up the same security concerns there.

If you have your wireless adapter enabled to connect to an in-flight hotspot, it may be possible for another passenger to create an access point that purports to be the airline network and trick you into connecting to it and then intercept your transmissions. If you have ad hoc networking enabled, someone else on the plane could create a peer-to-peer connection to your computer without your knowledge. Wireless sniffers can be used to capture packets being transmitted over the wi-fi network.

"Shoulder surfing" (someone looking at your keyboard and screen as you enter passwords or other sensitive information) may also present more of a concern on airplanes, since you are often seated in very close proximity to strangers. If you're connecting to your company's VPN or doing your banking online in the air, it's important to be sure nobody is watching what you type in.

Now there's another concern rearing its head - it's not just passengers' data that might be at risk with in-flight wireless networks; in some cases hackers might be able to go through the plane's entertainment network to get to its navigational and administrative systems because the networks are all linked together.

In January, the FAA issued a warning regarding this problem with Boeing's new 787 "Dreamliner" jet. Boeing says the problem has been fixed - but some computer experts aren't so sure. You can read more about that here:
FOXNews.com - How to Hack Into a Boeing 787 - Science News | Science & Technology | Technology News

Boeing has undoubtedly taken steps to secure the critical networks from those that are accessible by passengers - but security vulnerabilities often aren't apparent until a talented hacker discovers them. Much as I would like to be able to turn on my laptop and get full Internet access so I could get more done during a boring plane trip, I can't help wondering whether the technology provides one more opportunity for terrorists to take over the plane or for a (potentially fatal) mishap caused by a mischievous, computer-savvy teenager.

What do you think? Is this a reason to go slowly on the adoption of wi-fi in the air, or is the threat not worth worrying about? Do the benefits of in- flight access outweigh the possible dangers? If you have the choice to fly on a plane with wi-fi or one without, which would you pick?

WXPNews: Wireless on a Plane: Is it really such a good idea after all?

[emma roids]

is that the sequel to snakes on a plane?

lots of wireless jobbies go on the rampage on a 747

[Evilkitten]

I probably get a scared if internet access is available because who knows what people will access that could potentially endanger my life. This is just one step closer to making it easier for terrorist to cause some damage and it isn't like I can just get off when I want either once I am up there. Oo

In theory, nice idea but I think i'l stick with in-fight entertainment, I always managed to keep myself amused. I can check my e-mails later ^^

[Puratech]

Surely if they want to run an internet service on a plane, it should be entirely separate from anything important, i dont mean protected or firewalled, but the main plane electronics, communications, controls should not even be linked to anything with internet access, however tight.

[Harv]

Well you would hope so but apparently its too expensive to not have it installed using the same setup

I don't understand why its so difficult tbh but I do see where even if it was separate it wouldn't be too hard for someone to use the technology to circumvent the security.

I mean rogue access points are used for hacking so if there are 2 wireless networks on the plane ( leisure one and the airways one ) the opportunity to hack into the secure network is there.

This should be a fairly easy problem to overcome though its not like it takes rocket science to secure 2 wireless networks it will always open up that risk. The one thing that does worry me is that unless they have trained personnel on board to troubleshoot any problems they will get hackings occurring and its a long way up for people to be messing with stuff that controls he plane

[Laz]

Don't forget streaming porn! That will eat up a lot of bandwidth. And compound the "over the shoulder surfing" issue.