View Single Post
Old 17-01-2008, 19:35   #13 (permalink)
Name, Title, Location Tagred
Sometime Helper :P

Birmingham, UK
England
AvatarTagred's Avatar
Mood
Posts7,333
Karma Tagred is incredible.Tagred is incredible.
Tagred is incredible.Tagred is incredible.Tagred is incredible.Tagred is incredible.Tagred is incredible.Tagred is incredible.Tagred is incredible.Tagred is incredible.Tagred is incredible.Tagred is incredible.Tagred is incredible.
Pu10,607.15
Blog
Blog Entries: 2
Awards
TF Top Poster Bronze TF Top Poster - Silver TF Top Poster - Gold 
Total Awards: 3
Banana Monkey Monkey Mammoth Lion Cat 2 Baby Dragon Book Monkey Little Fishy Cash Banana Big Beer Pizza Medal

Default

I thik i would prefer hd dvd anyway, i cant stand to think that you have to use a cartridge to load a blu-ray, it smacks of going back to the 70's to me. Doesnt matter that it can store more information, same as betamax was better quality than vhs, its ease of use for me.

Is there really a big difference in the quality? I know the most studios dont really pack their dvd's with much extras anyway so i dunno why the extra storage is a selling point, because the presentation dvd's u buy will still be underpacked with almost nonsense rubbish stock footage and drawings that really dont add much value.

Oh well, im cynical me
Tagred's Sig:
KEEP TFing
ToolsTagred is offline
Reply With Quote